Why does a leader who cemented his political dominance through a centralized presidential system increasingly struggle to deliver economic stability and political confidence? This column, based on my latest book on Turkey’s Erdoğan administration, argues that the answer lies in the gradual erosion of what can be called “attraction politics.” For much of his rule, Erdoğan maintained dominance not through coercion but through a combination of economic performance, social protection, and narrative control. These pillars sustained broad public support for nearly two decades. Yet they rested on constitutional institutions. Once the centralized presidential system eroded these institutions, the three pillars no longer translated into effective governance.